JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 9, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para hacer seguimiento al cumplimiento de la sentencia T-025/04
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se comunica a la Sala de Reconocimiento de Verdad, de Responsabilidad y de Determinación de Hechos y Conductas de la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz que, si bien la Sala Especial de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-025/04 ordenó en casos excepcionales medidas cautelares de carácter urgente para proteger los derechos fundamentales individuales y colectivos de las comunidades afrodescendientes y los pueblos indígenas, en relación con las 28 comunidades frente a las cuales dicha entidad solicitó medidas cautelares, no se han proferido este tipo de órdenes.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la suscrita Magistrada,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. UNICO.- COMUNICAR, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, a la Sala de Reconocimiento de Verdad, de Responsabilidad y de Determinacion de Hechos y Conductas de la Jurisdiccion Especial para la Paz el contenido de la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.